Landing-site selection balances terrain safety, illumination, Earth visibility, thermal conditions, scientific access, mobility and mission architecture. The examples below show how those priorities change from a first crewed landing to a far-side rover or a south-polar campaign.
Mare Tranquillitatis
Apollo 11
- Terrain
- Broad mare plain selected for relatively manageable landing terrain within Apollo-era constraints.
- Illumination
- Mission timing provided suitable Sun angle for landing visibility and surface operations.
- Earth communications
- Direct Earth line of sight from the near side.
- Science
- Mare basalt, regolith and early crewed surface experiments.
- Resource context
- Not selected for resource prospecting.
- Operational trade-off
- Favourable first-landing safety and communications took priority over reaching the most geologically diverse site.
Open mission dossier
Hadley-Apennine
Apollo 15
- Terrain
- Mountain-front valley beside Hadley Rille, more geologically ambitious than earlier Apollo sites.
- Illumination
- Daylight operations with low-angle terrain relief useful for field geology.
- Earth communications
- Direct Earth line of sight from the near side.
- Science
- Hadley Rille, Apennine highlands, mare materials and broader rover-supported field geology.
- Resource context
- Not selected for resource prospecting.
- Operational trade-off
- Greater terrain complexity was accepted because rover mobility and improved landing capability opened access to richer geology.
Open mission dossier
Taurus-Littrow
Apollo 17
- Terrain
- Valley enclosed by massifs with access to highland and volcanic materials.
- Illumination
- Daylight EVA operations planned around landing and traverse geometry.
- Earth communications
- Direct Earth line of sight from the near side.
- Science
- Ancient highland material, mare basalt and pyroclastic deposits including orange soil.
- Resource context
- Not selected for resource prospecting.
- Operational trade-off
- A complex field site was chosen to maximise geological diversity during the final Apollo landing mission.
Open mission dossier
Von Kármán crater
Change 4
- Terrain
- Far-side crater floor within the South Pole-Aitken Basin.
- Illumination
- Normal lunar day/night cycle for the landing latitude.
- Earth communications
- No direct Earth line of sight; relay communications are required.
- Science
- Far-side surface geology, South Pole-Aitken context and in-situ measurements unavailable to Apollo sites.
- Resource context
- Primarily scientific rather than resource-driven.
- Operational trade-off
- Unique far-side science required a dedicated relay architecture and operations through a second spacecraft.
Open mission dossier
Southern high latitudes
Chandrayaan 3
- Terrain
- Southern high-latitude landing region selected for a soft-landing technology demonstration and local surface science.
- Illumination
- Operations were timed for local daylight; long lunar night constrained the nominal surface lifetime.
- Earth communications
- Direct and mission-architecture communications supported near-side high-latitude operations.
- Science
- Local temperature profile, plasma environment, seismic activity and elemental chemistry.
- Resource context
- Near the broader south-polar exploration zone but not a direct permanently shadowed ice-extraction demonstration.
- Operational trade-off
- High southern latitude increased exploration relevance while retaining a landing region compatible with the mission design.
Open mission dossier
Shackleton / south-polar region
Shackleton Region
- Terrain
- Rugged polar topography with crater rims, slopes and nearby permanently shadowed terrain.
- Illumination
- Very low Sun angles; elevated terrain can receive extended illumination while adjacent crater interiors remain in permanent shadow.
- Earth communications
- Earth visibility depends strongly on local horizon and exact site; relay capability can improve resilience.
- Science
- Polar volatiles, ancient geology, illumination and thermal extremes.
- Resource context
- High interest because cold traps can preserve water ice and other volatiles, but abundance and accessibility vary by location.
- Operational trade-off
- Exceptional science and resource interest come with difficult lighting, thermal boundaries, terrain and navigation conditions.
Explore the south-polar environment
